Earlier this year, I co-lead a few photography tours in Nepal, Bhutan and Hokkaido, Japan. While traveling for five weeks with my FUJIFILM GFX cameras I really embraced the 65 x 24 panorama crop mode which creates a classic panorama aspect ratio. The GFX cameras can capture images in this aspect ratio in the Raw + Jpeg mode which outputs both a raw image with the 65 x 24 crop and of course a similar jpeg. The beauty of this crop mode in the GFX cameras is that the camera still captures the entire 4 x 3 image but the image shows up in Adobe Lightroom Classic with the crop applied–as you saw it through the camera’s viewfinder. Hence, when you get back and download the images, at any point you can go in and remove the crop or tweak it ever so slightly if you didn’t quite get the composition right in camera.
I love the 65 x 24 panorama aspect ratio. The images just have an elegance to them when using this aspect ratio–similar to some of my favorite movies that use a panorama aspect ratio. As a working pro, I would never use this mode on an assignment unless specifically asked for by the client. An aspect ratio like this drastically limits what any client could do with the images. But on this excursion I was co-leading two different photography tours and there was no specific end-use for these images. I was there to help guide the participants in how I saw the scene and what I might do to create interesting images of that scene. Hence, I had the freedom to choose a different aspect ratio and many of the participants on these trips had similar cameras (Hasselblad or Fujifilm medium format cameras for the most part) that allowed them to choose a panoramic aspect ratio as well. In Nepal and Bhutan, I was working with my good friend Andy Biggs, who had a brand new Hasselblad X2D II with him that can capture images in a similar manner with the same aspect ratio. We were both feeling the panorama aesthetic and often talked about how a scene or a composition felt panoramic more than the standard 4 x 3 aspect ratio both of our cameras normally produce. In Hokkaido, I was co-leading another photography tour alongside my dear friend George Nobechi, who was also working with a FUJIFILM GFX100RF camera that has a similar panorama crop option.
On this five week trip, I created more panorama images than I have ever created before. The fact that the cameras I took with me had massive amounts of resolution also made me feel like I wasn’t giving up too much in terms of image quality. With a lower resolution sensor, cropping to a 65 x 24 aspect ration would mean committing to a much lower resolution final image, but with 102 megapixel sensor in the GFX cameras that resulted in a 50.1 MP final image. And using Adobe Super Resolution to upres the image I can resize the image to a whopping 200 MP easily with little to no image quality loss. Hence, these panoramas can be blown up to enormous print sizes if needed.
I have used this panoramic aspect ratio built into my GFX cameras in the past but it was while we were in Pokhara, Nepal that it felt like 65 x 24 was the right aspect ratio. We were staying at the Tiger Mountain Pokhara Lodge just outside of Pokhara, Nepal and on the back patio you had this epic view of Annapurna (8,091 m, 26,545 ft) and Machapuchare (6,993m/22,943ft) rising above the foothills as shown below. This long stretched out view of the Annapurna range was tailor made for a panorama. Hence, a lot of us on the trip who had cameras that could accommodate this option switched our cameras over to the 65 x 24 mode. I didn’t take that many panoramic images in Nepal but the few scenarios where I tried it out really worked well.
With my smaller format cameras–i.e. full frame 35mm sensors–instead of creating a panorama by cropping the image I typically capture multiple images and then stitch them together after the fact in Lightroom. With this technique I can’t really tell how the final image will look or even what the final composition will be. And sometimes, if I am not careful, the stitched image may not come together as well as I had hoped. I have had vignetting foil some stitched panoramas–and it is very hard to tell if that will be an issue while capturing the images to build the panorama later on. Other times the composition just wasn’t that great after putting it all together. The upshot is that stitching together panoramas can work well but it is much nicer to see the finished panorama in camera as you are composing the image–and to be able to make adjustments to the composition as you frame up the image.
Beyond the technical aspects of how the camera could create the panorama, seeing the world through a long rectangular box just made sense for so many scenes. The 65 x 24 aspect ratio seems to give landscapes room to breathe. The images feel more expansive than the normal 4 x 3 aspect ratio. In my experience, they just have a feeling of elegance. All of my feelings about panoramas might just be because I have literally seen thousands of movies using similar aspect ratios.
When we got to Bhutan, there were a lot of scenes where the panorama made sense–and also cleaned up foreground elements to make the final image stronger. I found myself starting to look for panoramas instead of just forcing the issue. My eye was being drawn to them. And the good news is that it was very easy to switch over to panorama mode just by changing my cameras settings from capturing raw images only to capturing raw + jpeg. I had the aspect ratio for my jpegs set up for 65 x 24 so changing this one setting to capture both raw and jpeg images automatically changed the aspect ratio for the raw images as well. I had both the GFX100S and the GFX100 II with me so I would often have one set up specifically for panoramas and the other for the standard 4 x 3 format. Below are a few images from Bhutan captured using the 65 x 24 aspect ratio.
When I got to Japan, I leaned into the panoramas even more so than I did in Nepal and Bhutan. I admit that this might have been influenced by the fact that most of the participants had a FUJIFILM GFX100RF camera that also has an aspect ratio dial on the back of the camera, which makes it very easy to switch to the panorama mode. Hence, because the participants were experimenting with all kinds of different aspect ratios I found myself also experimenting a bit–and mostly choosing the 65 x 24 panorama mode.
As can be seen below, I captured a lot of panoramas in Hokkaido, Japan. I was thinking about panoramas for that entire trip and looked for opportunities to make cool pano images. We visited a lot of aquariums as can be seen in the a few of the images below. Aquariums are a natural fit for pano images–or at least the ones we found in Hokkaido–because of the long rectangular windows you end up looking though.
Even in situations where I would not have chosen a panoramic style image in the past I found myself staying in the 65 x 24 aspect ratio as a way to test out my composition skills and experiment with the new format. One of the best images from my entire five weeks of travel is the black and white image below. This stormy scene of of a sea stack just off the coast of Hokkaido (south of Sapporo) works because of all the fresh snow falling and blowing around and also because of the many birds flying over the ocean. This image needs to be seen large to really get the full impact of the image–and I find that is the case with many pano images. Hopefully here in this blog post the images show up large enough so that the reader can at least get some sense of what is going on.
As we kept driving around Hokkaido, it seemed like at every turn there was yet another scene that could be improved using the panorama mode. In many cases I could just fit the aspect ratio to the landscape or to the scene that was in front of me. And it was fun. Looking for panoramas was not new to me but doing so with an in-camera crop in this manner was not something I have done a lot of in the past given that I am normally creating images for clients. As can be seen below, I created a lot of panorama images in Japan. Below are some of my favorites from that trip.
Sadly, panorama images are not so easy to share on social media. The small format of your phone or even the web does not really do them justice. Sure, you can chop them up into three panel images that you swipe right to see the image details but that just doesn’t have the same impact as seeing the image printed large and hanging on a wall. Panoramic images really are meant to be printed. I will certainly make some large prints of a few of these images–just to see how they feel.
Maybe one day I will have a client that wants panorama images–I have had it happen in the past a few times. Most clients asking for panorama images are looking for ultra-high resolution images that will be put up on giant walls in office buildings and they want the image to span 50 feet (15 meters) or more in the entrance way.
I am not sure if this excitement about panoramas is the start of a new personal photo project but I can certainly see myself going back to locations I have photographed before with a new way of photographing those landscapes. Even for action and adventure images I can see creating some panoramas just to make something different–for myself if nothing else. One of the main reasons I still teach photo workshops and lead photo tours is to expand my own horizons. Panoramas aren’t anything new really but immersing myself into that way of thinking can open up new creative pathways–even if a client never asks for anything like this.
This year I have been fortunate to photograph both the rollout and the launch of NASA’s Artemis II rocket. The rollout (as shown above) happened at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida on Saturday, January 17, 2026. And luckily for me the launch, which was supposed to happen in early February, got pushed back until April 1, 2026 due to hydrogen leaks in the first fueling tests. Since I have been traveling an incredible amount this year already, it was a matter of luck that I was able to get out to Florida for the launch. It is always an honor to be out at Kennedy Space Center and to document the incredible work of the NASA employees–and this launch especially was quite the experience.
Having photographed the Artemis I launch back in 2022, I was able to procure a media badge this year for Artemis II. In 2022, I ended up photographing the launch for Amazon Alexa, since Alexa was running in the unmanned capsule. This time around I did not have an end client for my images but still went out and photographed the launch hoping to build up my relationship with NASA. I have been working on this relationship for a long time. My first interaction with NASA was going out to Johnson Space Center and giving a presentation on my work to the in-house NASA photographers stationed there. Since, I have also been one of the judges for the NASA Photographer of the Year competition for the last seven years.
While the rollout of the rocket is less of a thrill than the actual launch, it is still quite an event to see the 322 foot (98 meters) tall rocket emerge from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) and roll towards Launch Pad LC-39B. The NASA Crawler-Transporter 2, which moved the Artemis II rocket out to the launch pad creeps along at a maximum speed of up to 1 mph (1.6 kph) so as it moves past the media below there are plenty of opportunities to photograph it from various angles. For the rollout, there were also quite a few NASA employees (as shown below) that had worked on the rocket and who were there to see all of their hard work make its way to the launch pad. Notably, when it emerged from the VAB, we could see “America 250” emblazoned on the solid rocket boosters celebrating the 250th anniversary of the United States of America.
After the rollout, I was off to Nepal, Bhutan, and Japan for the next five weeks. I kept an eye on the fueling tests and the proposed launch dates to see if I would even be in the USA to photograph the launch. I expected some delays given the similar hydrogen leaks that plagued the Artemis I launch, but I didn’t quite expect it to push the delay back two full months. Also, Artemis II was scheduled to be another night launch–similar to Artemis I. The Artemis 1 launch (shown below) took place at 1:47 AM on November 16, 2022 and as you can see here it was a very difficult launch to photograph because of the extreme contrast. For that launch the plumes of the rocket were so bright it was as if the sun came out at night. Once Artemis I cleared the tower you basically could not see the rocket at all–and all we could see from the ground was the intensely bright white plume of the rocket in a pitch black sky. Hence, I wasn’t sure if it was even worth it to go back out and photograph the Artemis II launch if it ended up being a night launch as the photographs would basically look the same.
In the launch calendar that NASA published back in January, there were only two days where Artemis II was slated to launch in daylight. April 1 was the first daylight launch window and the other one was the last date at the end of April. Of course, regardless of when it launched we all hoped the launch would go smoothly and the four astronauts on board would come back safely. But, when I saw that April 1 launch window starting just before sunset I was secretly hoping that somehow the launch would be delayed until April 1st. And as we all now know, that April 1 launch date ended up being the day it launched.
Right up until a few days before the launch, I was hemming and hawing as to whether or not I should actually go out for the launch. When I applied for the media badge, I also applied to place remote cameras close to the rocket as well. Sadly I did not get clearance for placing remote cameras this time around but I still had a media pass to photograph the launch from the Press Site, which is 3.4 miles (5.47 km) away from the launch pad. The Press Site is basically the closest viewing point for the launch so it is still a pretty epic spot to be at for a launch.
When I photographed the Artemis I launch it felt quite a bit different because it was an unmanned flight test. With Artemis II, there were four astronauts onboard including Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen and there was obviously a lot more at stake this time around. The Artemis I launch drew a lot of people to watch the launch but nothing like the Artemis II launch. It is estimated that 400,000 people gathered at various locations along the Florida space coast to watch Artemis II blast off. It was the largest crowd for any launch since the Apollo era launches fifty-three years ago. For those of us at the Press Site, we were instructed to arrive at least seven hours in advance. I arrived at the Press Site at 10:00 AM, a full eight and a half hours early.
Once on site, everyone is getting set up and placing tripods and gear out in the grassy field to claim a spot in front of the press buildings. The later you show up the more limited the choices are for claiming a spot. I chose a spot with a clear view of the rocket and with the lagoon in the foreground. From my prior experience photographing the Artemis I launch, I knew that a 400mm lens was about the right focal length for a horizontal composition. At the Artemis I launch, I had a Nikkor 500mm lens, which was an awesome tight composition but I thought after the fact that it was a bit too tight, especially considering the high resolution cameras we have these days. Hence for Artemis II, I brought three camera bodies for a variety of different compositions including my Nikon Z9 and Z8 as well as my FUJIFILM GFX100 II. For lenses, I had a Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8, a Nikkor Z 400mm f/4.5, a Nikkor Z 24-70mm and the 1.4x teleconverter as well. For the GFX100 II medium format camera I brought the incredible GF250mm lens along with the 1.4x Teleconverter for that lens.
I had three tripods (two Gitzos and one Really Right Stuff) all set up next to each other as shown above. I had the Nikon Z8 and the 70-200mm lens set up for a vertical composition at a wider focal length to capture the launch with some room to have the rocket a fair ways off the pad. I had the Nikon Z9 set up with the aforementioned 400mm lens in a horizontal composition–this was my tightest composition. And last, I had the GFX100 II set up for a vertical composition with the GF250 and the 1.4x teleconverter. The GF250 plus the teleconverter made that lens a 350mm focal length, which in 35mm terms is equivalent to about 273mm. I also had all three cameras tethered together with three Pocket Wizard transceivers so that when I triggered the Z9 the other two cameras would fire off as well. All cameras were set to capture raw images at their fastest frame rates–which for the Nikons was 20 fps and for the GFX was 8 fps. Working at the maximum frame rates meant that I could create a timelapse video of the launch with my still images after the fact.
Below are a few of the frames from the Nikon Z9 with the 400mm lens. This horizontal composition gave me a great set up for a tight shot of the launch off the pad. I love how the rocket’s plume billows even after the rocket is out of the frame. My exposure settings on the Z9 were 1/2500th second shutter speed, f/8 and ISO 200. These are the exact same settings I used for the Artemis I night launch back in 2022. This exposure setting is basically one full stop below the ambient exposure.
On the Z8 I set the exposure slightly differently, I underexposed just a bit more by using a shutter speed of 1/3200th second, and also at f/8 and ISO 200. The difference, only a third of a stop was minimal but I wanted to experiment for future launches. As no one had ever photographed a daytime launch of Artemis before, there wasn’t a consensus among my fellow photographers as to what was the best exposure setting for a daytime launch. Because of this I set all of my cameras to slightly different exposure settings. I set the FUJIFILM GFX100 II to 1/2,000th second at f/8 and ISO 200. Below you can see the wider composition I had setup on my Nikon Z8 and the 70-200mm lens.
With the GFX100 II, which is a 102 MP camera, I knew that it could handle the dynamic range a bit better so I did not underexpose as much with that setup. As shown below, I had a slightly tighter vertical composition than with the Nikon Z8 setup shown above. I knew that I could crop a horizontal image out of the GFX vertical composition and still have a roughly 57 MP image. Hence, there were plenty of megapixels to play with and the vertical composition just gave me more options.
It would have been great to have all three cameras set up at different areas of the Press Site to get a wider variety of images with people in the foreground and other elements in the frame but I was worried that the Pocket Wizard transceivers might not fire off the other two cameras. There were of course a lot of other news outlets present at the press site, including the NASA live feed, with huge lights and transmitters all around that could have interfered with my transmitters. As shown below the live NASA feed had an entire set built up with astronauts and newscasters commentating on the launch as it happened and for hours before. In the background of this same image you can see the NBC and CBS buildings as well with similar newscast setups on the roofs of the buildings. Hence, that is why I kept my cameras relatively close together.
Luckily towards the end of the day, there was not as much heat distortion as there was early in the hottest part of the afternoon. When I took test shots earlier in the day, around 1 PM the rocket was noticeably soft from the heat distortion and the far distance we were from the rocket. This is not unusual when using long telephoto lenses in the middle of the day. Thankfully all of the images were tack sharp in the evening light when the rocket did launch.
In terms of autofocus, I focused on the rocket with each camera and then I turned the autofocus off on all the cameras that were on the tripods just to make sure nothing shifted when the countdown got close to zero and I initiated the exposures. I also had my compositions locked in and figured out hours before the launch so that there was little that could go wrong when the rocket launched. Additionally, I tested out the Pocket Wizard transceivers a few times to make sure they would fire all three cameras and not stop until the rocket left the frame of each camera’s composition.
In addition to the three cameras I had set up on tripods, I also borrowed a fourth camera set up from Nikon Professional Services, which had an entire cache of gear onsite. For this fourth setup I got a Nikon Z8 and a Nikkor Z 100-400mm zoom lens. I set this camera up to fire off at 15 fps and with full autofocus tracking and laid it on my camera bag at my feet. The idea was that when the rocket left the launch pad and left the frame for all of the compositions I had set up with the tripod mounted cameras, I would then pick up the Z8 and the 100-400 and could continue photographing the rocket as it flew into the upper atmosphere above the press site as shown below.
The 100-400mm lens proved to be a versatile focal length for these grab and go images with the rocket far above us, but in hindsight, I would have also had a fifth camera with an 800mm lens on it as well to get a really tight shot of the solid rocket boosters (SRBs) coming off the rocket. I did manage to get an image of the SRBs falling away from the rocket but they were tiny in the frame. Once the rocket was well beyond our atmosphere, which only took eight minutes or so, there were plume formations in the sky making for wild abstract images. I keep on shooting well past the launch looking for shapes, colors and anything that seemed interesting. Nearly an hour after the rocket launched the plume was still spinning around in the sky basking in the last light of the day and glowing bright orange and red against the deep blue sky.
At the very end of the day, the moon rose just above the low clouds on the eastern horizon and I happened to be in the parking lot putting away gear. There were several photographers that saw this and quickly pulled out a camera and lens to capture the moon rising. From my vantage point I also had the USA and NASA flags in the foreground as well. This seemed like a wild scenario to see the full moon rising on the horizon just after Artemis II launched and was soon to be heading towards the moon.
Of course, as an assignment photographer I am used to having a lot more access and creating a much wider variety of images. Hopefully at some point I will have more access and can get a wider variety of images for NASA, National Geographic, or some other major news outlets. This was only my second Artemis launch, and my second rocket launch of any kind, so I have learned a lot in just a few outings.
After the cameras were packed away, we started downloading images on our laptops and stayed at the Press Site knowing that traffic would be in a huge snarl for many hours to come. I left at around 11 PM thinking that surely most of the traffic would have cleared out. My hotel was in Orlando, about an hour away so I had a ways to go before I could get to sleep. Leaving five hours after the launch, I still ran into bumper to bumper traffic on the outskirts of Orlando. What is normally a 50 minute drive out to Kennedy Space Center took nearly two hours and I arrived back at the hotel at around 1:30 AM.
It was only in the following days that I realized what this launch meant to many of us around the world. As I wrote in my Spring 2026 Newsletter editorial entitled “A Glimmer of Hope”:
In the days that followed after the launch, it became clear to me—and all of us for that matter—just what a big deal this was. In these dark days; with war fomenting in Iran, a President who has completely lost touch with reality, and the world changing at breakneck speed, it was soothing to see scientists, engineers, pilots and experts in their fields all come together for an ambitious mission to go to the Moon. Sure, we have been to the Moon before. We aren’t necessarily breaking new ground here. But just as with the Apollo missions in the late 60s and early 70s, when humans dare to venture farther than they ever have before in such a grandiose manner, that awakens something in all of us. For ten days as the four astronauts flew to the Moon and back, there was a glimmer of hope that humanity is not doomed. If we can go to the Moon, perhaps we can come together and solve our big problems like climate change, inequality, racism, greed, war and many others.
In addition to the glimmer of hope the Artemis II mission gave us all, they came back with some absolutely stunning images as well. I had a feeling that some of the images would become iconic but when those images from the far side of the Moon started streaming in we got a whole new perspective not only of the moon but also of our planet. I would also say that still photography in general had a moment when these images created by the astronauts started streaming in. The astronauts captured video as well in some scenarios but it was the still images that really struck a chord with us Earthlings. Below are a few of my favorite images captured by the astronauts.
My thanks to NASA for the inspiration and the incredible mission to the moon and back–and for the media pass to allow me to be there on site for the launch of Artemis II. I have high hopes that I will be able to go back and document the Artemis III and Artemis IV launches as well here in the next few years–and hopefully expand the coverage and access.
To see all of the best images and time-lapse videos from this project visit my website and view the Artemis II gallery.
Recently, I was interviewed by Ian Dawson for his podcast named the Chasing Light Network. For these interviews Ian is choosing to do a long format conversation–the interview is one hour and thirty-three minutes long. We covered a wide range of topics including gear, safety, how I pull off these assignments, the state of the industry and much more. He has interviewed at this point eleven working pro photographers and is adding new interviews to his website fairly often.
From his website, “Ian is a 9 time Emmy award winning producer in motion graphics, VFX, branding, and XR. From feature films, TV, commercials, and experiential activations, they all have a component of image creation, and the camera is one of the best tools used to help tell a story.” He has a ton of experience having been in the film industry in Hollywood for 30 years.
You can find my interview on the Chasing Light Network website or on YouTube. The podcast also streams on Spotify and on Apple Podcast. My thanks to Ian for having me on the podcast and for the excellent conversation.
The Spring 2026 issue of the Michael Clark Photography Newsletter is now available for download. If you’d like to sign up for the Newsletter just drop me an email and I’ll add you to the mailing list.
This issue of the Newsletter includes an editorial entitled A Whirlwind Start to the Year, an equipment article entitled The Search for the Perfect Photo Backpack, an article detailing a recent assignment photographing the Red Bull Air Force skydive team wingsuiting under the Aurora Borealis, an editorial entitled A Glimmer of Hope, and much more.
The Michael Clark Photography Newsletter goes out to over 8,000 photo editors, photographers and photo enthusiasts around the world. You can download the Spring 2026 issue on my website at:
If you’d like to check out back issues of the newsletter they are available on my website here.
Please note that the newsletter is best viewed in the latest Adobe Acrobat reader which is available for free at www.adobe.com.
If you are a subscriber and you have not already received the Newsletter, which was email out yesterday please send me an email with your current email address and/or check your spam folder.
Note: 2026 kicked off with an incredible amount of travel, which is why this is the first blog post of the year. I have only been home a total of five weeks at this point and there will be a lot more to share from all of the adventures and assignments I have been on.
Above: Mike Brewer wingsuit skydiving under the Aurora Borealis near Palmer, Alaska on March 23, 2026.
Every once in a while an assignment comes together with electricity buzzing through the entire crew—the athletes, photographers, cinematographers, producers, athlete managers and the entire crew see the magic of the moment and realize that the sum is greater than the whole. My latest assignment with Red Bull and the Red Bull Air Force skydivers was one of those rare gigs where everything magically came together. For this assignment we were tasked with documenting Jeff Provenzano, Jon Devore and Mike Brewer as they wingsuit skydived under the Aurora Borealis, otherwise known as the Northern Lights, up near Palmer, Alaska.
This project has been in the works for a long time. Jeff called me three or four years ago with the seed for this idea. He wanted to finish his last skydive in all 50 states and Alaska was the last one left on the list. His idea was to skydive under the Aurora Borealis, which meant a skydive in winter in Alaska—at night. He came to me to help figure out the technicalities of capturing that scenario. After a few days of thinking about it, I got back to Jeff and told him how I thought we could document it with still photography. His next call was to Jon DeVore, the captain of the Red Bull Air Force skydive team. Jon helped figure out the logistical aspects of pulling it off and building the team to do it. Ever since that first call with Jeff, I have been scheming on how we could capture the images. Hence, this has been a collaboration from the start.
In the last few years we have had plane tickets, lodging, rental cars and everything booked on a few different occasions only to have it cancelled the night before we were supposed to fly up to Alaska. In each case, the weather changed suddenly or the Aurora forecast fizzled out and the trip was cancelled. Red Bull spent a serious amount of money just paying for cancelled flights, hotels, and rental cars over the last few years. When I got the call from Jon DeVore in mid-March that we were going to head up a few days later and give it a go I was somewhat in disbelief. On the flight up to Alaska the cloud cover looked dodgy and the Aurora forecast wasn’t as solid as we would have hoped for, but as can be seen in the image below of the helicopter parked next to our lodge with the Northern Lights ablaze in the sky it miraculously all came together.
In my work over the last 16 years or so with the Red Bull Air Force I have asked various team members to fly remote cameras and create images because I cannot physically do what they do and because I am not a skydiver. Even if I was a skydiver, I still couldn’t do what these athletes do—even if I had been skydiving at a high level for the last ten years. It is a true collaboration between photographer and skydivers who take my input and mix it with their skydiving skills and their own photographic intuition and with the team we come together to create something wild and unique.
For this assignment, there were two methods I dreamed up for documenting this historic flight—as no one had ever (as far as we know) skydived below the Aurora Borealis. As usual in adventure photography, the best images are almost always those created closest to the subject. Hence, my first plan was to have a remote camera mounted on the helmet of a third wingsuit skydiver who would jump with Jeff and Jon. As for the technical aspects of this, the idea was that Mike Brewer would fly the camera and literally create the images by biting down on a “tongue switch” connect to the camera and running into his helmet. The Idea was that Mike, Jon and Jeff would fly together with Jon and Jeff formed up next to each other with the Aurora streaming down above them. In terms of the camera settings, the camera was set for a long exposure to let in enough light to show the Aurora Borealis, and then I found a very small flash, which would be mounted on top of the camera. That flash would go off at the end of the exposure to illuminate Jon and Jeff and also freeze their motion (because of the very short, fast flash duration). In my mind, there was always going to be a bit of motion blur in the image. Because the sky divers were flying at terminal velocity (approximately 120 mph) the Aurora would be slightly blurred and the skydivers motion would also be blurred because they can’t stay perfectly 100% in line as the one-second exposure plays out. This first idea seemed easy to pull off and I had high confidence that we could get this set of images.
As shown above, the camera I chose to use for the air-to-air images was my trusty old Nikon Z6 and a Nikkor Z 20mm f/1.8 lens. The original Z6 came out in 2018 and I have used it on several nighttime assignments—most notably with the Marine Special Forces (aka MARSOC) where we photographed them by moonlight on a mock mission each night for six days in a row. The resulting images from that MARSOC assignment showed me that the Z6 is an exceptional camera in low light and at high ISO settings. Hence, it would be an ideal camera for this project and the fact that it was also one of the smallest and lightest weight cameras I owned was a bonus for Mike Brewer, who would be flying the camera. A few years ago, I purchased a used Nikon SB-400 speedlight specifically for this project, which would also be mounted on the Z6. The SB-400 is the smallest Nikon speedlight that I could find and it hasn’t been manufactured since the early 2010s. Luckily, Nikon still has exceptional TTL speedlight functionality even with its newest mirrorless camera offerings. That SB-400 was the key to these air-to-air images. In the images above, I also have a SmallRig cage mounted on the camera, which we decided to take off to save weight when we mounted this rig on top of Mike Brewer’s helmet. I also used a liberal amount of gaffer’s tape on the flash and the camera body to make sure the flash–which had a fairly cheap, plastic body–didn’t fly off mid-flight with all of the air pressure at 120 mph.
The second plan was similar but perhaps even more complex to pull off. As the photographer on the ground, I would try to capture the skydivers as they came in for a landing under canopy. The Red Bull Air Force doesn’t just plop down when they land, they are using smaller parachutes and typically come in at sixty-to-eighty miles per hour swooping over the landing for a hundred feet or more before skidding to a stop. For this image, I would put my camera on a tripod, use a long exposure for the Aurora and then use a powerful flash to again freeze the motion of the skydivers and illuminate them against the green skies above. The trick with this was timing the image so I didn’t clip off the beginning of the swoop or the skydiver at the end of the exposure. Having to use a long one to two second exposure made it very tricky to initiate the exposure at just the right moment so that the skydiver didn’t go off the edge of the frame.
Originally, this assignment was a still images project because of the difficulty of capturing video of the Aurora Borealis. If you search the internets, there are very few videos of the Aurora. Typically any video you see of the northern lights is made with still photography and then that series of long-exposure images are put together to create a time-lapse video. The reason for this is that most Aurora Borealis light shows are not all that bright. On occasion you get some bright northern lights but that is the exception rather than the norm. In the two or three years we have been waiting for everything to line up some of the upper echelon decision makers at Red Bull changed out and video became a request for this project as well—since video tends to do better than still images on social media. This presented a huge technical issue as capturing video would require a fairly bright Aurora. To capture the video side of things, veteran cinematographer Collin Harrington was brought in to figure out the logistics and make it happen.
Once we were onsite, the skydivers did a daytime wingsuit skydive to get themselves situated and test out the landing area in daylight. On that skydive, we also had Mike Brewer, who would be flying the cameras test out my Nikon Z6 and the bite trigger to make sure everything worked as planned. Before they took off in the helicopter we all had a group safety meeting and discussed the landing plan to help coordinate the landing images. For the under canopy images, I needed the skydivers to make a long straight landing so I could judge their height and speed to line up the motion blur images as they came in for a landing. As can be seen in the images below it was a cloudy afternoon when we were testing the camera, the flight and the landing zone. There were quite a few things to figure out on the skydiving end of things and a lot to make sure would work on the still photography end of things as well. This daytime skydive was critical for all of us to literally get everything lined up.
As it started to get darker Mike, Jeff and I headed out to the back porch of the house we were based out of and started testing the camera exposure and flash settings. One of the key things we had to dial in was the lighting on the skydivers themselves. We had them put LED strip lights into their wingsuits so that the camera could focus and so that Jon and Jeff could see each other in the sky. What we found out right away was that the dim LED lights were still too bright. Originally, I wanted them to be white lights, but we found out that by switching the LEDs to red that the light was considerably dimmer. Hence, we went with the red light. Even with the red lights, the camera was struggling to focus on Jeff as he walked towards camera and with a three second exposure we were getting a lot of light bleed from the LEDs. I figured the motion blur of the LED lights would trail the skydivers in the air so I wasn’t too concerned with that but it certainly looked a lot different than the images I had thought through before arriving on site. Of more concern was whether or not the camera would be able to focus on the skydivers. The small Nikon TTL flash did help out with that as it popped a pre-flash off at the beginning of the exposure to figure out the amount of light required to illuminate the subject—and this also helped establish the distance for the autofocus as well. I dialed in the exposure settings and turned down the flash exposure compensation to -1.3, and then we just had to hope everything would come together up in the sky.
While we were testing out the still camera and the flash settings on the back deck, Collin Harington was also testing out the video settings to see how it might look. If he hadn’t been out there with us figuring out the exposure for the video cameras then I would have not clued into one very critical technical aspect of my whole concept. About a half hour after we dialed in the camera settings, I realized that Colin’s video camera eliminated a lot of the red-light haze because he was using a faster (i.e. shorter) shutter speed. He and I talked about this at length trying to problem solve the haze issue. Once I figured out that the shutter speed could lessen that issue Mike, Jeff and I went back out on the porch and tested the theory. It seemed to help but honestly, I wasn’t sure this whole plan I had worked out was going to work.
Later that evening, it was clear that video would be the first priority as it was technically more difficult to capture the Aurora on video than it would be for the stills and the Aurora was slated to be brighter and more consistent that first night. Luckily, the clouds parted around 11:30 PM and we could see a decent Aurora forming. Shortly thereafter, it was decided that stills would go first instead of video. Since we had the camera already set up it was just a matter of changing the camera out on top of Mike’s helmet. But as the skydivers walked out to the helicopter, I was internally quite skeptical of what we might get and a little worried my plan might not work at all.
As painful as it is for me as a photographer to say, these air-to-air images (shown below) are not my images—I have to give all credit to Mike Brewer—and of course Jeff and Jon as well, who are the heroes of these air-to-air images. These are Mike Brewers photographs (the air-to-air ones). While in the air, Mike Brewer saw something I couldn’t imagine before the flight and as a talented photographer himself, he changed up the game plan because he saw the Aurora was closer to the horizon rather than straight above them. He flew just below and to the side of Jeff and Jon to force the Aurora into the background of the images. So not only was he flying in extremely cold temperatures—close to -21 F (-29.4 C) when they exited the helicopter—but as soon as they were up to speed going 120 mph the windchill was over -100 F (-73 C). It was Mike’s on the spot rethinking of the composition, his incredible ability to place himself where he needed to be and Jeff and Jon’s abilities to hold position that all came together to create these air-to-air images.
Above and Below: Images by Mike Brewer (in collaboration with Michael Clark) — Jeff Provenzano and Jon DeVore wingsuit skydiving under the Aurora Borealis near Palmer, Alaska on March 23, 2026.
Once Jon, Jeff and Mike landed we headed inside to check out the images and warm up. Mike handed me his helmet with the camera on it—and I pushed the playback button to start reviewing images. I had gotten through three images of varying light patterns—which were basically abstract art gibberish–when the video crew asked us to hold up so they could film our reactions to the images. I looked at Mike and we both had the same thought, “Oh, crap, what if there is nothing on here?” A few minutes later myself and the skydivers—along with the Red Bull Producers also looking on—starting going through the images. Those first three abstract light streak images kept us in suspense and then the first flying image came up and Mike and I were instantly blown away and much happier. We were going backwards through the images so the farther along we went the closer Mike was to the wingsuit skydivers—and the better the images got. The motion blur of the red light made it look like the skydivers were on fire flying under the Aurora Borealis. Having the red LEDs in the wingsuits is something none of us had thought about but it worked out beautifully in hindsight. The images turned out quite different than the images I had in mind—but they were even better than anything I think any of us could have dreamed up. That right there—the planning, the execution, and the surprise after we created the images—and seeing something we could not have imagined is what has made this project so exciting for all of us involved. Instantly, the buzz spread to everyone involved in the project. It felt like we had just pulled off a magic trick–and a project that seemed nearly impossible to pull off was now suddenly a reality.
The first air-to-air image above was the best image and the shot where Mike Brewer was closest to Jon and Jeff. But there were other wild images as well. The second image above, the horizontal image as they left from the helicopter, was so wild I had to have a discussion with Mike as to what is actually happening in the image. The light streaks in that image are from the helicopter and the streaks are because Mike, Jon and Jeff are falling away from the helicopter. The red and green colors around the helicopter are motion blur blobs from lights on the helicopter itself. Apparently, and I did not know this beforehand, helicopters have different colored lights on them when they fly at night so that oncoming flight traffic can tell which side of the helicopter they are approaching. Hence, the green and red lights. The weird plating on the bottom of the helicopter is because the lights on the helicopter are blinking off and on. This image in particular shows the Aurora but also surprised me in so many ways as there is a lot I could not have anticipated.
In addition to the air-to-air images, on this same skydive, I was in position to create a motion-blur swoop landing image–as discussed above. Both Jeff and Jon swooped in straight above my position and I wasn’t able to reposition the camera quickly enough but Mike Brewer came in just as we had discussed and I was able to get the swooping image you see below. For this image, I had an assistant hold my Elinchrom FIVE strobe about 100-feet (30 meters) to camera right and we turned the flash down all the way. The flash was set to TTL mode as we could not predict the distance the skydiver would be from the flash. Even with the flash turned all the way down the subject in this image is quite bright–just on the edge of being blown out. But, the wicked fast flash duration of the strobe–a little over one eight thousandth of a second (t0.1)–froze the motion of the skydiver at the end of the exposure just as I had planned. On that first jump this was the only usable image I got from the ground. Knowing I had this one swoop motion blur image made me feel a whole lot better as we walked back into the lodge to look at the air-to-air images described above.
Once we had gone through the images captured on Mike’s helmet, I showed off the one image I got from the landing. For that image (shown above) we used a similar concept of a long shutter speed to show the Aurora and a powerful flash to illuminate the skydiver as they came in for a landing. The timing to make this work—and the skill of the athlete who was at that point freezing from an epic flight—all had to come together. In three attempts we got this one image of Mike where everything aligned just perfectly. The lights blurring behind Mike with the Aurora right behind him was the icing on the cake. The fact that this image was created on the same skydive as Mike’s incredible air-to-air images kind of blows me away. Everything we wanted to get (save for the portraits of the team) essentially came together in the span of two minutes on one skydive. And that was the only skydive we would get for the still images.
Once the athletes were down it took them a while to warm back up. Now the emphasis turned towards capturing the same scenario on video. Sadly, the Aurora faded over the next few hours so we were up until 3 AM waiting for good Aurora to capture the video. There was one decent spell of Aurora but it was not deemed bright enough so we called it a night at 3:30 AM. The buzz around the still images was so high that everyone was talking about how this might end up just being a still photography project. But we still had another night of Aurora the next day and the team held out hope that we could capture what we needed in another 24 hours.
The next day the team did another skydive over the Knik Glacier just up the road from our lodge. Jeff, Jon and Mike landed on the toe of the glacier and it made for some wild images with them landing just outside of an ice cave as shown below. We did a few group portraits there as well since it was a very unusual place to see wingsuit skydivers. In the group image below, is Jon, Jeff and Mike as well as Amy Chmelecki (in the pink jacket), who is also a team member of the Red Bull Air Force and who ran ground logistics for this project.
Later that second evening, the Aurora was lackluster at best. It wasn’t looking good for the video crew. It was our pilot, Ryan from Alpha Aviation Alaska, who saved the day and walked into the packing room and told the team to get ready to take off. We had been checking the Aurora every ten minutes all night so we were a bit surprised by Ryan’s call to action. He was a local and had flown a lot in Alaska so he had some intuition (or information we didn’t have) that the Aurora was about to kickoff. Following Ryan’s call the team headed out to the helicopter and just as he predicted there was a two minute spell of brighter Aurora that allowed the team to jump and get video of the wingsuit skydive under the Aurora. You can see some of that video footage in an Instagram post shared by the Red Bull Air Force–click on the image below.
Once the video was captured, the post-production team jumped into action and shortly there after we watched the footage as a group on a giant TV in the lodge. Everyone involved in the project was absolutely ecstatic that we were able to pull this ridiculously tough assignment off and capture not only the still images but also some incredible video footage as well. I was also elated that we got the video as I felt pretty bad for Colin, the cinematographer brought in for this project, who was unable to get anything the first night. The video just capped off the entire project–and everyone was so buzzed by the magic of the evening that it was difficult to go to sleep that night.
While the video post-production guys were working up the video I had one last image I needed to create to wrap up the stills portion of the assignment. We could not go home without a portrait of the wingsuit skydivers under the Aurora Borealis. Hence, I set up the Elinchrom FIVE battery-powered strobe and dialed in some settings for a group portrait just off the back porch of the lodge. Once we had it dialed in we brought the skydivers out in their full kit and had them pose down for the final group shot. As can be seen below, they were a bit amped up because at this point they knew we had pulled off a project that had been a dream for three years or more.
This assignment and this collaboration was a long time coming–and from the start a group of individuals (all of whom are close friends after working together for so long) came together to solve all the logistics and technical issues to make it happen. And on top of that, this collaboration created a set of images that have never been created before and we managed to even exceed my own concept and expectations. Often you dream up an image and have that in your mind as the ultimate image. It is extremely rare in my experience to go well beyond that image you created in your mind. And by exceedingly rare, I mean it almost never happens and in thirty years of working as a pro photographer there are only a handful of times I have seen it happen. This was one of those times.
This assignment has also been a huge source of inspiration not just for me but also for the team, who are now dreaming up even bigger, more challenging projects to go after. For myself, it is inspiring to see a near impossible project come to fruition and also get a taste of that photography magic that rarely happens–even when photographing dozens and dozens of assignments each year. That magic can be a turning point in a career and has already given me a lot of inspiration to keep on pushing my creativity in both personal projects and assignments.
Creating images that are nearly impossible to pull off is what really gets me excited—I love pushing into unknown territory and working with a team to create something completely new in the photographic space. That has only happened a handful of times in my career and it very rarely happens in the photographic space but there is magic in those endeavors. A huge thanks to Red Bull for this assignment and to Jon DeVore, Jeff Provenzano, Mike Brewer and Amy Chmelecki as well as Jay Brooks for making this all happen. Additionally, to all of the Red Bull in-house managers and producers, it took all of us to pull this one together and I can’t wait for the next adventurous assignment like this one with Red Bull. Congratulations to Jon, Jeff and Mike for being the first humans to ever wingsuit skydive under the Northern Lights.
This year marks the 30th year I have been in business as a professional photographer. Just typing that out is pretty mind-blowing. Thirty years in the photo industry is basically an eternity. I am very happy to say that I am still pursuing epic images and trying to push the envelope of what is possible. I am still just as passionate about photography as I ever was, and I am looking forward to the next ten or fifteen years of adventures. I am not sure at the start I would have ever dreamed I would make it this far and looking back it has been an incredible three decades.
2025 has also been a been a year of ups and downs. The photo industry has been in a rough spot since early 2024 (as I said in my 2024 Year in Review), but even so I have a number of clients that keep me busy. I can’t really complain. The start of the year was rough to say the least. In April I had five assignments lined up and then the new tariffs were announced and all five were cancelled the next day. One of the companies I was slated to work for said they would not be shipping any product to the USA for the next five months and that they would also not be spending any money on marketing until they see how the tariffs shook out. Those damn tariffs have been a huge blow to the photo industry — and the greater economy as well. As Stephen Colbert said in a recent Late Show episode, “I think we can all agree that 2025 blows.” But, with all that said, it has still been a decent year for me.
Yet again, this year saw me working with the Red Bull Air Force several times as well as creating images on my own. Without further ado, here are what I consider the best images I have created this year.
Red Bull Aerial Performance Camp Grand Bahama — The Bahamas
My seven day assignment with Red Bull at the 2025 Red Bull Aerial Performance camp in the Bahamas in March was by far the most exciting and amazing gig I had this year. I had never been to the Bahamas before so I didn’t know quite what to expect, but holy chihuahuas it was amazing. As can be seen in the images below, the color of the water and the reefs was an incredible array of blues from turquoise to emerald green.
This training camp included Red Bull’s aerial athletes from around the world–in all around 45 athletes from a wide range of disciplines. Hence, there was a lot going on all the time and it was a constant task to keep up on the next thing I needed to document. I wrote an extensive article about this assignment in my Summer 2025 Newsletter. There are so many amazing images that we created at this performance camp that it is hard to pick just a few to share here.
In addition to the images shown above many of the best images created during the performance camp were a collaboration with the athletes. In most cases these were all created using GoPro cameras mounted on helmets or on the aircraft. This year I did a lot of experimentation to get the best possible image quality out of the GoPro Hero 12 and Hero 13 cameras–and in most cases I set up the cameras to capture images using the timelapse intervalometer built into the GoPros. I would sometimes set them to capture JPEGs at two frames per second and other times I set them up to capture one RAW image every three seconds. The RAW images out of the new GoPros are far superior to the jpegs. (Sidenote: Oh, how I wish the GoPros could capture raw still images at three or four frames per second–that would make them much better for this type of work.] For some of these images I pushed the record button on the GoPros (just before the plane or helicopter took off) to start the image capture process and in other cases the athlete started the GoPros and initiated the image capture process. So, I cannot say these are my images alone–they were a team effort and I will indicate that below each image.
Perhaps the best image from this year is the one below captured by Amy Chmelecki who had a GoPro mounted on her helmet during a sky dive where they met up with Luke Aikins and his experimental airplane known as the “Silver Bullet.” This image just blew our minds because of the orientation of skydivers right on the horizon and the incredible colors and textures in the water below. Amy did a fantastic job moving farther away from the entire group to get this image and luckily the camera fired off a few epic images at just the right moment. I set the GoPro up in the raw capture mode which meant it fired once every three seconds. That was a tough decision as there are only a dozen or so frames of the sky dive but the images it captured are all incredible. To be clear, I managed the camera, Amy turned it on and captured the images and then I worked them up in Lightroom. Regardless of how it was captured, this is one of my favorite images from 2025 hands down. A huge thanks to Amy for getting this image–it is one of the best images from my many years of working with the Red Bull Air Force.
Image by Amy Chmelecki in collaboration with Michael Clark
One of the other top images created using GoPros during the performance camp is the image below where Kevin Coleman is flying upside down while doing his aerobatic routine. The wild blue colors of the ocean below him feel like a sky. When I downloaded the images this was the orientation the image was in which is the opposite of what it really is–Kevin would be in the top part of the frame if it was oriented normally. With a few tweaks in Lightroom the GoPro RAW image really came to life and the colors are just out of this world. The soft pastels and the reflection in Kevin’s visor are what really make this image for me. A huge thanks to Kevin for letting me mount the GoPro in this prime position just in front of his cockpit to get this image.
In the same vein of remote camera images, I mounted a few GoPros on Kirby Chambliss’ plane when he and Kevin did a flight together in extremely close proximity. For this flight Kirby Chambliss flew upside down above Kevin Coleman over the Grand Bahama and the two images below were the result. Likewise, the third image below is of Aaron Fitzgerald doing his helicopter aerobatic routine over the ocean. No matter where you put the camera basically every perspective was amazing.
On the very last day, Issa Kalfon (a brand new Red Bull athlete) flew his jet pack over the West End Point of the island and this image of him just floating their over the water really struck me as something wild. All of the athletes were pretty awestruck at this jet pack and wanted to see Issa fly every time he went up. It is not everyday you see a human flying a jet pack so this was a wild, awe inspiring thing to watch.
While I had other fun and exciting assignment this year, this week-long gig in the Bahamas was far and away the wildest assignment and as you can see here yielded most of the best images that were created this year–whether they were made with a camera in my hands or by remote mounted GoPros documenting what the athletes saw as they danced in the sky. My sincere thanks to Red Bull and all of the athletes for such an incredible week in the Bahamas. Fingers crossed we can get back out there again one of these days.
Bisti Badlands De-Na-Zin Wilderness, New Mexico — USA
This past spring, I spent a few days exploring the Bisti Badlands in the De-Na-Zin Wilderness in northern New Mexico. This once little known area has exploded in popularity since many Instagramers have promoted and tagged its location, showing the wild hoodoo landscapes. The first time I went there very few people could even find it, much less explore it. Back in those days, it took me quite some time to actually find it and even longer to find any of the formations on that first trip nearly two decades ago. When I went back this spring I was surprised to find a parking lot with signs and abundant information, making it easier than ever to explore the main area of the Bisti Badlands.
What is not clearly marked out is how to find some of the northerly formations like the Bisti Wings, shown below. It is still quite easy to get lost if you are not paying attention (or have a compass or GPS). This desert landscape is ruthless to those not thinking clearly. It is a very serious flash flood zone so you have to pay very careful attention to the weather. Even walking in to some of the formations after it has rained can be very difficult or nigh on impossible because of the nature of the clay-like soil. It is also wicked hot in summer–and can still be quite hot in the spring and fall. Regardless, it is still a place of stunning beauty.
If you do go visit the Bisti Badlands, I implore you to please tread lightly and to refrain from touching or hiking on or near the hoodoo formations. This is a very fragile landscape and some of the iconic formations have already collapsed due to poor judgement by some visitors. By all means, go explore and enjoy this area but also show respect to these incredible formations.
Cowboys Santa Fe, New Mexico — USA
This summer, I taught the same workshop twice for the Santa Fe Workshops. That workshop was called The Western Portrait. Both were a total blast to lead and the participants were excellent. The Santa Fe Workshops did a fantastic job setting up this workshop and bringing it all together. Luckily, here in Santa Fe, we have quite a few western landscapes and resources, i.e. ranch hands and movie towns, to work with. In fact, if you have seen a western in the last forty years the odds are extremely high that it was shot at one of the several movie ranches just south of Santa Fe.
For this workshop, one of the locations we worked at was with Clint and his son Wyatt Mortenson. who oversee the Eaves Movie Ranch and are often actors and facilitators working on whatever western movie is being shot on their properties. We had them riding their horses and lassoing cattle during these workshops and I was able to create some wild motion blur images of them on the run as shown below. The top image here is my favorite as it is quite a painterly motion blur but the horse and riders are still sharp enough to make sense of the scene. The last photo below shows the Bonanza Creek film set and the main street that runs right through it. This film set was used for films like 3:10 to Yuma, and many others.
Bridge Rider San Francisco, California — USA
Another wild assignment for Red Bull this year was with Sean MacCormac, who dreamed up this idea of grinding the San Francisco Bay Bridge while skydiving with his snowboard nearly a decade ago and finally made it happen on Saturday, August 23, 2025. There were several photographers documenting this event (as well as a huge video crew) and I was positioned in a helicopter just next to the bridge which afforded quite a wild perspective as shown below. Sean had been practicing for this by skydiving and landing on a wire (over land) for a few months before he attempted it on the bridge. Sean skydived twice and landed on the wire both times so we only had two goes at capturing images, which made it especially intense.
In addition to the wild sky dive, the perspective of San Francisco from helicopter was also pretty exceptional. We were out right at dawn and the fog that engulfed the city made for some interesting images as well. I have included one of those “landscape” type images of San Francisco here as well.
Aurora Borealis Santa Fe, New Mexico — USA
Amazingly, in early November this year there was a major corona mass ejection from the sun, which then created a strong Aurora Borealis in Santa Fe, New Mexico on November 11, 2025. I think this is only the second time that I have ever heard of an aurora being visible in New Mexico. This one was a Kp 9 and was the brightest aurora in more than 20 years. Luckily we had clear skies. I went out in our backyard and photographed the aurora with the 100-year old windmill that lives on our property. It was so bright that you could see it with the naked eye just as it looks here in these images–which is not always the case with auroras.
There are certainly other images I could share from 2025, but I figured I would leave it here–and just share my favorites. I had several other assignments where I documented the action but those didn’t rise to the level of the images you see here. As many might have noticed, Red Bull has become one of my main clients and it is always a pleasure to work with them.
So long 2025. My thanks to Red Bull and all of my other clients with whom I worked this year. Thank you for taking the time to check out some of this year’s highlights. Feel free to comment on any of these images and tell me which one you think is the best of the best from this year.
2026 is already shaping up to be an adventurous year with flights already booked for Alaska, Nepal, Bhutan and Hokkaido, Japan — and that only covers January and February. I can’t wait to see what the rest of the year brings. Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year to you all. Here’s hoping your 2026 is filled with even more adventurous travels and amazing experiences!
The Fall 2025 issue of the Michael Clark Photography Newsletter is now available for download. If you’d like to sign up for the Newsletter just drop me an email and I’ll add you to the mailing list.
This issue of the Newsletter includes an editorial entitled The Grand Canyon Newsletter, a review of the Arca-Swiss Core 75 Leveler geared tripod head, an article detailing a recent photography assignment photographing Aaron Fitzgerald flying his Red Bull aerobatic helicopter in Hellhole Bend, an editorial entitled A Seismic shift in Photography Education, and much more.
The Michael Clark Photography Newsletter goes out to over 8,000 photo editors, photographers and photo enthusiasts around the world. You can download the Fall 2025 issue on my website at:
If you’d like to check out back issues of the newsletter they are available on my website here.
Please note that the newsletter is best viewed in the latest Adobe Acrobat reader which is available for free at www.adobe.com.
If you are a subscriber and you have not already received the Newsletter, which was email out yesterday please send me an email with your current email address and/or check your spam folder.